home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=91TT2840>
- <title>
- Dec. 23, 1991: The Political Interest
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
- Dec. 23, 1991 Gorbachev:A Man Without A Country
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 36
- THE POLITICAL INTEREST
- Getting It Right with the Jewish Vote
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By Michael Kramer
- </p>
- <p> Mario Cuomo had a choice when he addressed an audience of
- Miami Jews on Dec. 5. He could score with some cheap political
- rhetoric, or he could tell the complicated, nuance-laden truth.
- Cuomo chose the former. In a speech that pushed every pro-Israel
- button known to man, New York's Governor singled out the Arab
- states' economic boycott of Israel for special condemnation. The
- applause increased when Cuomo identified Japan as a particularly
- egregious and cowardly collaborator. "I was in Japan [in
- October], talking every day about the Arab boycott," said
- Cuomo. "You know what a difference it would make if you could
- get Japan involved in business with Israel?"
- </p>
- <p> On the surface, Cuomo's attack was unremarkable. Japan
- bashing is fashionable these days, and decrying the Arab boycott
- (which surely deserves it) is the quickest way to a Jew's heart.
- But Cuomo knew better. He knew that while the Japanese
- government has sent mixed signals to the nation's corporations
- about the boycott, Tokyo has officially called for its
- suspension. He also knew that several Japanese companies were
- already selling cars in Israel and that other Japanese
- enterprises would begin trading with Israel soon. In fact, Cuomo
- knew this all so well that in his conversation with Taro
- Nakayama, who was then the Foreign Minister, the Governor said
- he was "appreciative of" Japan's "changing attitude on the
- boycott."
- </p>
- <p> Saying different things to different audiences is not
- exactly uncommon in politics. And ever since Dwight Eisenhower
- complained that his golf game suffered because someone was
- "always yelling Nasser at the top of my backswing," every
- politician with national ambitions has been attuned to how his
- Middle East views play on the U.S. political scene. Today's
- Democratic contenders are no exception. Even those who are
- toying with isolationism make an exception for Israel. They know
- that American Jews are a bountiful source of campaign
- contributions and that they vote in numbers far exceeding their
- percentage of the population. (In New York, for example, a
- Jewish population of 12% will probably account for more than 30%
- of the state's 1992 Democratic primary vote.)
- </p>
- <p> From Israel's perspective, all of this year's Democratic
- can didates are "right" on the current litmus test--Jerusalem's request for $10 billion in U.S. loan guarantees to
- resettle Soviet Jews. Beyond that touchstone, the contenders'
- stances fragment. The candidate in the most potential trouble
- with American Jews is Bob Kerrey, who's "right" now, but who
- refused to co-sponsor the Senate bill that would have authorized
- granting the loan guarantees last fall. Kerrey's other problems
- include his calling Israel's West Bank settlements "provocative"
- and his insistence that the U.S. embassy remain in Tel Aviv (a
- sore point with Israel's government, which wants it moved to
- Jerusalem).
- </p>
- <p> Paul Tsongas and Douglas Wilder have been "good,"
- according to Jewish leaders who monitor such matters. Bill
- Clinton has lately made all the right noises, but he could be
- hit for merely asserting that Israel will "inevitably" have to
- trade land for peace, and for favoring an "evenhanded" Middle
- East policy--"evenhanded" signifying an Arab tilt to some
- Jews.
- </p>
- <p> Tom Harkin, who says evenhandedness is "ridiculous," has
- been all over the lot. While Jewish groups view him as
- generally "right," Harkin twice voted to cut foreign aid to all
- countries by 5%. He could be hurt as well by a May 13, 1991,
- letter to an Iowa constituent in which he supported "a
- negotiated settlement that would satisfy the national
- aspirations of both the Israelis and Palestinians," a
- formulation that apparently envisions an eventual West Bank
- Palestinian state.
- </p>
- <p> None of the announced candidates can top Mario Cuomo, who
- scores a perfect 10 on the Pander Meter. Some highlights: in
- 1988 Cuomo unsuccessfully advised Michael Dukakis to break with
- the 30 Democratic U.S. Senators (most of them strong supporters
- of Israel) who had urged Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir to
- negotiate with the Palestinians. In June 1990 Cuomo praised
- Shamir for "correctly refusing to offer any guarantees that
- would limit the settlement" of Soviet Jews "anywhere in Israel."
- Last month Cuomo derided President Bush's Middle East maneuvers,
- saying, "I don't believe you should be evenhanded between the
- people who share your values and have been your staunch allies--always, without exception--and people who have not." One
- can only hope that to further peace, a President Cuomo would
- mute such talk, but then again the Governor is famous for saying
- exactly what he means and acting accordingly.
- </p>
- <p> Meanwhile, Bush, who won 31% of Jewish votes in 1988,
- plugs along. If ever he doubts that good policy is sometimes
- smart politics, he should recall history. Shortly before the
- 1956 election, Eisenhower took Egypt's side in the Suez Canal
- dispute. He warned Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion "not
- [to] make any grave mistake based upon [your] belief that
- winning a domestic election is as important to us as preserving
- the peace." Ike won in a landslide and captured 40% of the
- Jewish vote, still the high-water mark for a Republican. If
- today's peace talks produce significant progress before next
- November, Bush could confound everyone by replicating Ike's
- showing among Jewish voters--and he would deserve to.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-